It seems really trendy these days to talk about How Stan Lee "ripped" off Jack Kirby
Can you enlighten me as to why somoe peopel believes this so strongly.
From what I know they always worked as a team and collaborated on each other's contributions.
Jack was the chief art direction and Stan was the lion shared of character creation.
Why is that so hard for some people to deal with.
Stan is obviously a carnival barker but that doesn't take away from his legacy.
Atleast it shouldn't.
The short version is that a couple of mainstream media stories popped up in the 70's, as Marvel Comics rose and overtook DC, and became recognized as being read by college-aged individuals, and not just little kids. The mainstream media portrayed things as being all Stan (he was the mouthpiece, editor, and 'voice' of Marvel, plus, he worked in the office, so was there to represent, etc. The ignorance of the media ticked off Jack, who took his resentment out on Stan. A few word-of-mouth promises made by publisher Goodman to Jack were just lip service, and for some reason, even though these deals weren't made through Stan, Jack held Stan to them and held him responsible for them not occurring (and Jack left for DC). Also, while Stan often credited their comics as bring by Jack and Stan with no other specific credit, Jack wanted to be spedifically credited as the co-plotter. Then even though Stan was long gone to the west coast by then, when Jack fought Marvel for the return of his old artwork, just as Stan was given credit for all the good stuff, greater fandom kinda held him responsible for these kinds of conflicts with Marvel overall. Then, as Jack got older, he got kinda kooky in his claims to have solely created everything under the sun including Spider-Man....this further divided fandom.......Jack being dead and Stan still smilin' doesn't help matters either.....you always pick on the guy still standing, y'know?
